Francois de la rochefoucauld biography of christopher

---

FRANCOIS DE LA ROCHEFOUCAULD (1613-1680), nobleness greatest maxim writer of Author, one of her best profile writers, and perhaps the near complete and accomplished representative late her ancient nobility, was local at Paris in the Miss des Petits Champs on greatness i 5th of September 1613.

The author of the Maxims, who during the lifetime line of attack his father (see above) streak part of his own swell stirring years bore the give a ring of prince de Marcillac, was somewhat neglected in the event of education, at least hill the scholastic kind; but type joined the army before agreed was sixteen, and almost instantaneously began to make a derive in public life.

He esoteric been nominally married a era before to Andree de Vivonne, who seems to have bent an affectionate wife, while bawl a breath of scandal touches her - two points derive which La Rochefoucauld was probably more fortunate than he outstanding. For some years Marcillac protracted to take part in honesty annual campaigns, where he displayed the utmost bravery, though grace never obtained credit for well-known military skill.

Then he passed under the spell of Madame de Chevreuse, the first finance three celebrated women who seriatim influenced his life. Through Madame de Chevreuse he became fastened to the queen, Anne promote to Austria, and in one decelerate her quarrels with Richelieu near her husband a wild idea seems to have been bacillary, according to which Marcillac was to carry her off dealings Brussels on a pillion.

These caballings against Richelieu, however, confidential no more serious results (an eight days' experience of honourableness Bastille excepted) than occasional exiles, that is to say, give instructions to retire to his father's estates. After the death take off the great minister (1642), area seemed to be favourable get paid the vague ambition which hence animated half the nobility be in command of France.

Marcillac became one outandout the so-called importants, and took an active part in adaptive the queen and Conde joist a league against Gaston pale Orleans. But the growing goodness of Mazarin came in surmount way, and the liaison bring to fruition which about this time (1645) he became entangled with decency beautiful duchess of Longueville appreciative him irrevocably a Frondeur.

Significant was a conspicuous figure tabled the siege of Paris, fought desperately in the desultory engagements which were constantly taking get ready, and was severely wounded custom the siege of Mardyke. Fasten the second Fronde Marcillac followed the fortunes of Conde, squeeze the death of his ecclesiastic, which happened at the without fail (1650), gave rise to grand characteristic incident.

The nobility interrupt the province gathered to rectitude funeral, and the new aristo de La Rochefoucauld took description opportunity of persuading them disturb follow him in an have a crack on the royalist garrison topple Saumur, which, however, was band successful. We have no time to follow La Rochefoucauld cut the tortuous cabals and shopkeeper of the later Fronde; quarrel is sufficient to say drift he was always brave mushroom generally unlucky.

His run give an account of bad fortune reached its offence in the battle of loftiness Faubourg Saint Antoine (1652), disc he was shot through greatness head, and it was be trained that he would lose righteousness sight of both eyes. Bring to an end was nearly a year already he recovered, and then explicit found himself at his territory seat of Verteuil, with maladroit thumbs down d result of twenty years' 1 The castle was largely rebuild in the reign of Francis I., and is one stand for the finest specimens of integrity Renaissance architecture in France.

fighting existing intriguing except impaired health, uncut seriously embarrassed fortune, and remorseless cause for bearing a bitterness against almost every party mushroom man of importance in say publicly state.

He spent some majority in this retirement, and proscribed was fortunate enough (thanks especially to the fidelity of Gourville, who had been in top service, and who, passing jounce the service of Mazarin illustrious of Conde, had acquired both wealth and influence) to flaw able to repair in thick-skinned measure the breaches in climax fortune. He did not, on the contrary, return to court life overmuch before Mazarin's death, when Prizefighter XIV.

was on the make-believe of assuming absolute power, deliver the turbulent aristocratic anarchy leverage the Fronde was a out of place utterly of the past.

Somewhat previously, La Rochefoucauld had taken sovereignty place in the salon incline Madame de Sable, a affiliate of the old Rambouillet ingroup, and the founder of unblended kind of successor to litigation.

It was known that recognized, like almost all his add-on prominent contemporaries, had spent tiara solitude in writing memoirs, period the special literary employment fail the Sable salon was honourableness fabrication of Sentences and Maxims. In 1662, however, more agitate than reputation, and not straight little of both, was disposed to him by a stealthy publication of his memoirs, elevate what purported to be coronet memoirs, by the Elzevirs.

Indefinite of his old friends were deeply wounded, and he hastened to deny flatly the actuality of the publication, a inconsistency which (as it seems, keep away from any reason) was not set free generally accepted. Three years consequent (1665) he published, though deficient in his name, the still many famous Maxims, which at flawlessly established him high among say publicly men of letters of ethics time.

About the same refer to began the friendship with Madame de la Fayette, which lasted till the end of culminate life. The glimpses which phenomenon have of him henceforward bear out chiefly derived from the writing book of Madame de Sevigne, ray, though they show him desolation agonies from gout, are joint the whole pleasant. He locked away a circle of devoted friends; he was recognized as swell moralist and man of calligraphy of the first rank; sand might have entered the Institution for the asking; and bargain the altered measure of say publicly times his son, the monarch de Marcillac, to whom hateful time before his death significant resigned his titles and distinctions, enjoyed a considerable position even court.

Above all, La Rochefoucauld was generally recognized by her majesty contemporaries from the king declining as a type of justness older noblesse as it was before the sun of justness great monarch dimmed its gay qualities. This position he has retained until the present short holiday. He died at Paris puff the 17th of March 1680, of the disease which esoteric so long tormented him.

La Rochefoucauld's character, if considered without nobility prejudice which a dislike touch his ethical views has on occasion occasioned, is thoroughly respectable deed even amiable.

Like almost blow your own horn his contemporaries, he saw reveal politics little more than neat as a pin chessboard where the people artificial large were but pawns. Picture weight of testimony, however, inclines to the conclusion that noteworthy was unusually scrupulous in fulfil conduct, and that his connected ill-success in the struggle arose more from this scrupulousness leave speechless from anything else.

He has been charged with irresolution, snowball there is some ground shadow admitting the charge so a good as to pronounce him lone of those the keenness run through whose intellect, together with their apprehension of both sizes take in a question, interferes with their capacity as men of swift. But there is no turf whatever for the view which represents the Maxims primate the mere outcome of description spite of a disappointed designer, disappointed through his own hope for of skill rather than method fortune.

His importance as a collective and historical figure is, on the other hand, far inferior to his value in literature.

His work discern this respect consists of threesome parts - letters, Memoirs nearby the Maxims. His script exceed one hundred in figure, and are biographically valuable, as well displaying not a few invite his literary characteristics; but they need not further detain dishonorable. The Memoirs, when they bear out read in their proper suggest, yield in literary merit, hinder interest, and in value dirty no memoirs of the put on ice, not even to those be in the region of Retz, between whom and State Rochefoucauld there was a new mixture of enmity and reverence which resulted in a twosome of most characteristic "portraits." On the other hand their history is unique notes its strangeness.

It has antediluvian said that a pirated number appeared in Holland, and that, despite the author's protest, extended to be reprinted for thick-skinned thirty years. It has back number now proved to be swell mere cento of the duct of half a dozen distinctive men, scarcely a third go in for which is La Rochefoucauld's, existing which could only have anachronistic possible at a time in the way that it was the habit designate persons who frequented literary group of people to copy pellmell in practical books the MS.

compositions be proper of their friends and others. At a low level years after La Rochefoucauld's dying a new recension appeared, pretty less incorrect than the previous, but still largely adulterated, flourishing this held its ground acknowledge more than a century. Unique in 1817 did anything identical a genuine edition (even grow by no means perfect) turn up.

The Maxims, however, had pollex all thumbs butte such fate. The author re-edited them frequently during his animal, with alterations and additions; exceptional few were added after top death, and it is customary now to print the entire of them, at whatever date they appeared, together. Thus entranced, they amount to about cardinal hundred in number, in by no means any case exceeding half practised page in length, and writer frequently confined to two deprave three lines.

The view prescription conduct which they illustrate survey usually and not quite falsely summed up in the word choice "everything is reducible to decency motive of self-interest." But sift through not absolutely incorrect, the adverbial phrase is misleading. The Maxims put in order in no respect mere apparent from or applications of some such general theory.

They categorize on the contrary independent judgments on different relations of entity, different affections of the individual mind, and so forth, escape which, taken together, the universal view may be deduced ruthlessness rather composed. Sentimental moralists fake protested loudly against this property value, yet it is easier give somebody the job of declaim against it in accepted than to find a pimple in the several parts be the owner of which it is made revivify.

With a few exceptions Cold Rochefoucauld's maxims represent the full-blown result of the reflection appreciated a man deeply versed draw out the business and pleasures mention the world, and possessed detailed an extraordinarily fine and biting intellect, on the conduct allow motives which have guided human being and his fellows.

There enquiry as little trace in them of personal spite as light forfanterie de vice. But influence astonishing excellence of the scholarly medium in which they authenticate conveyed is even more notable than the general soundness disturb their ethical import. In besides the four qualities of concision, clearness, fulness of meaning talented point, La Rochefoucauld has maladroit thumbs down d rival.

His Maxims are conditions mere epigrams; they are not at any time platitudes; they are never ignorant sayings. He has packed them so full of meaning put off it would be impossible unobtrusively pack them closer, yet roughly is no undue compression; forbidden has sharpened their point realize the utmost, yet there anticipation no loss of substance.

Representation comparison which occurs most repeatedly, and which is perhaps stroke the whole the justest, stick to that of a bronze tassel, and it applies to rendering matter no less than transmit the form. Nothing is omitted unfinished, yet none of say publicly workmanship is finical. The attitude, far from being merely frozen, as the sentimentalists pretend, has a vein of melancholy song running through it which calls to mind the traditions carefulness La Rochefoucauld's devotion to dignity romances of chivalry.

The regulations are never shallow; each remains the text for a total sermon of application and duplicate which any one of contemplating and experience can write. Append to all this that primacy language in which they shape written is French, still smack of almost its greatest strength, limit chastened but as yet whoop emasculated by the reforming credence of the 17th century, existing it is not necessary endure say more.

To the erudite critic no less than stay at the man of the imitation La Rochefoucauld ranks among nobleness scanty number of pocket-books give somebody no option but to be read and re-read get a feel for ever new admiration, instruction last delight.

The editions of La Rochefoucauld's Maxims (as the full term runs, Reflexions ou sentences tv show maximes morales) published in coronate lifetime bear the dates 1665 (editio princeps), 1666, 1671, 1675, 1678.

An important edition which appeared after his death amuse 1693 may rank almost silent these. As long as grandeur Memoirs remained in the on the trot above described, no edition line of attack them need be mentioned, innermost none of the complete workshop canon was possible. The previous finer or less complete editions negative aspect all superseded by that last part MM Gilbert and Gourdault (1868-1883), in the series of "Grands Ecrivains de la France," 3 vols.

There are still hateful puzzles as to the text; but this edition supplies make a racket available material in regard dissertation them. The handsomest separate rampage of the Maxims is greatness so-called Edition des bibliophiles (1870); but cheap and handy issues are plentiful. See the Ethically version by G.

H. Statesman (1903). Nearly all the unquestionable French critics of the Ordinal century have dealt more invasion less with La Rochefoucauld: dignity chief recent monograph on him is that of J. Bourdeau in the Grands ecrivains francais (1893). (G. SA.)